USPTO serial 74208194
GOLD LABEL BY SAN MIGUEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLD LABEL BY SAN MIGUEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mandaluyong, Metro Manila, PH
Mandaluyong, Metro Manila, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold Traub
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, PA220 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | packaged ice cream sold through supermarkets, grocery stores and the like | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |