USPTO serial 74208199
CHER FITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHER FITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA L. CAIRNEY
ROBERTA L CAIRNEY FENWICK & W LLP100 THE EMBARCADERO 3RD FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys action figures; board games and card games; electronic games (hand held unit for playing), including computer game programs, computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes, and computer game videos, video game cartridges, video game cassettes and video output games; kites; baseballs, basketballs, footballs, golf balls, handballs, net balls, playground balls, racket balls, soccer balls, sports balls, squash balls, tennis balls, and volleyballs; dolls and doll play sets; plush toys; toy vehicles; rollers skates and in-line skates; toy model hobbycraft kits; jigsaw puzzles, cube-type puzzles, and manipulative puzzles; musical toys; puppets; toy balloons; skateboards; yo-yos; face masks for protection while engaging in athletic activities, and swim masks; free weights; ankle, wrist, and leg exercise weights; weightlifting belts; exercising equipment; namely, weightlifting machines and resistance machines; exercise benches; stair step aerobic exercise machines, rowing machines, and treadmill exercise machines; stationary exercise bicycles; manually operated exercise equipment in the nature of exercise bands; exercise mats; racquets, bats (baseball), volleyball nets, and baseball mitts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |