USPTO serial 74208528
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wilmington, DE
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Wilmington, DE
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet L. Cullum
KALEIDA LABS, INC1495 CHARLESTON RDMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multimedia audio/video players/recorders comprised of computer hardware; computer programs and related instruction manuals sold as a unit, used in the production and presentation of multimedia | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1994 |
| 016 | computer instruction manuals pertaining to computer hardware and computer programs used in the production and presentation of multimedia | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1994 |
| 042 | consultation in the use of computers and multimedia equipment, said consultation being rendered through the means of courses and seminars | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2002 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |