USPTO serial 74208818
CASAREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASAREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM R HINDS
727 23RD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile goods, namely, table covers, table linen, napkins, serviettes, bed covers, bed linen, sheets, pillow cases, towels, tea towels, duvet covers, valances, namely, a short curtain or drapery for hanging from the edge of a bed, table, shelf, and the like, and in the nature of curtain/drapery toppers; shower mats, wash cloths, dish cloths, bath linen, pot holders, and place mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | footwear; headwear; and clothing, namely, T-shirts, uniforms, shorts, bath robes, overalls, dresses, trousers, shirts, namely, casual shirts, sweatshirts and polo shirts, work coats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |