USPTO serial 74208946
BOATING TODAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOATING TODAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mt. Clemens, MI
Mt. Clemens, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Bliss
DANIEL H BLISS BLISS MCGLYNN, PC2075 W BIG BEAVER RDSTE 600TROY, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video tapes featuring boating | ABANDONED | Jun 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |