USPTO serial 74208976
BAYMOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1996
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAYMOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
5090 Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
5090 Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
5090 Leverkusen-Bayerwerk, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Fairchild
JOHN D FAIRCHILD CONNOLLY AND HUTZ1220 MARKET BLDGP O BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products for industrial purposes; namely, plastics, synthetic rubber, mixtures of synthetic rubber and plastics in the form of powders, granules, pastes, and liquids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |