Drawing for POWERPC WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 74209446

POWERPC WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERPC WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur J. Jacobs

ARTHUR J JACOBS JACOBS & CONKLIN445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042mail order catalog services featuring computer hardware and software; and telephone shop at home servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 1995CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 1995SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 24, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 12, 1995EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 15, 1995EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 29, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 1994PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 26, 1994PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 21, 1994PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jun 29, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 17, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance