USPTO serial 74209450
DAKSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAKSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
4811 CA Breda, NL
Other trademarks owned by Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
4811 CA Breda, NL
Other trademarks owned by Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanford W. Berman
STANFORD W BERMAN BERMAN & AISENBERG1730 RHODE ISLAND AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-3186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer, mineral and aerated waters and soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Verenigde Nederlandse Brouwerijen Breda-Oranjeboom B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DAKSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |