USPTO serial 74209769
THE BLUE NILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BLUE NILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Avis Frazier-Thomas
AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS DRUCKER & SOMMERS9465 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 328BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services; namely, live performances by a musical group | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1994 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |