USPTO serial 74209892
NOVOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOVOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oak Creek, WI
Oak Creek, WI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | adhesives for use with iron, steel, aluminum, copper, galvanized (zinc coated) steel, flexible polymeric (plastic) foam, glass, ceramics and wood composite board | ABANDONED | Sep 13, 1991 |
| 002 | coatings; namely, liquid, heat curable protective and/or decorative coatings for use on iron, steel, aluminum, copper, galvanized (zinc coated) steel, flexible polymeric (plastic) foam, glass, ceramics and wood composite board | ABANDONED | Sep 13, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |