USPTO serial 74210332
FELSENTHAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 1993
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FELSENTHAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D CALHOUN III
JOSEPH D CALHOUN III GILL LAW FIRMCAPITOL AND BROADWAY3801 TCBY TWRLITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3460Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, sporting apparel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 22, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 7, 1999 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |