Drawing for COBRA

USPTO serial 74210570

COBRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUNG, SARAH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COBRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007industrial robots used for radiographic inspection and parts thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 1994OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 16, 1994OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 19, 1994ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance