USPTO serial 74210601
POCKET PLB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POCKET PLB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | miniature personal locator beacon for personal use in locating the source of the sender of a radio signal | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |