Drawing for CAMDEN YARDS

USPTO serial 74210652

CAMDEN YARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMDEN YARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BINGHAM B. LEVERICH

BINGHAM B LEVERICH COVINGTON & BURLINGP O BOX 7566WASHINGTON, DC 20044UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper goods and printed materials; namely, trading cards, mounted and unmounted photos of a baseball stadium, sticker albums, laminated signs made of paper, paper weights, felt-tip pens, ball point pens, roller ball pens, pencils, pads, letter openers, posters, note paper, calendars, markers, erasers, pencil sharpeners, ungraduated rulers, book covers, coloring books, playing cards, dealing with sports commerative books, dealing with sports yearbooks, folders, and postcardsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Jun 30, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 16, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance