Drawing for IBISYS

USPTO serial 74210694

IBISYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUNN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IBISYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy A. French

TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer data collection, processing and transmitting devices; namely, minicomputers, personal computers and computers for scientific use; data transmission computer networks comprising computer hardware and software; data processors with expandable architecture; computer terminals for accounting, banking, administration and points of sale (retail stores); computer peripherals for data collection; processing and transmission devices; namely, computer keyboards; writing and printing devices; namely, impact and non-impact printers; device for recording and reading data on magnetic and optic disks, tapes, and cards; namely, disk drivers, tape drivers and card drivers; computer monitors; telex machines, telegraph machines, telephones and fax machines; apparatus for office automation; namely, memory typewriters; apparatus for sending and receiving electronic mail; namely, modems, electronic computers, terminals and typewriters with communications facilities; apparatus for filing and recovering information; namely, blank magnetic and optical data carriers; computer programs for use in the organization of an integrated office environment and for use with the aforesaid computer machines and apparatusABANDONED—
016computer manuals for use in the organization of an integrated office environment, blank paper tapes and cards for the recording of computer programsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 1995ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 1, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 1995OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 1994OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 29, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance