USPTO serial 74210964
THE STADIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE STADIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-601 17 Norrkoping, SE
S-601 17 Norrkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest A. Beutler
ERNEST A BEUTLER HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | shoes; namely, sporting shoes and boots | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | gymnastic and sporting articles; namely, skis and ski poles; ice skates, helmets and sticks for ice hockey and bandy; ice skates for figure skating, rackets for tennis, squash, badminton and table tennis; sports balls; sit-up boards, exercise weights, and training equipment for gyms; namely, sit-up boards, wall bars, exercise bicycles, rowing machines, stair climbing machines, manually operated lifting and pushing machines, overhead press chairs and manually operated multi-exercise machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail shops featuring shoes, boots, gymnastic goods and sporting goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EKLOF i Norrkoping AB
- Other trademarks owned by EKLOF i Norrkoping AB
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE STADIUM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |