USPTO serial 74211065
SALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1878317Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 1995
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard O. Bartz
RICHARD O BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ PASTE 350, 6750 FRANCE AVE SEDINA, MN 55435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | foldable shades, sunshields, sunshades, accordian windshield shades and clips for holding folded shades, sunshields, and windshield shades for motor vehicles, aircraft, trailors, motor homes and watercraft | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2019 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2001 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| May 15, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 7, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |