USPTO serial 74211211
FOREST SPRINGS SPRING WATER SPARKLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOREST SPRINGS SPRING WATER SPARKLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CARTIER & INNISKILLIN VINTNERS INC.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by CARTIER & INNISKILLIN VINTNERS INC.
CARTIER WINES & BEVERAGES CORP.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Niagara Falls Ontario, L2E 6N8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard C. Mitchard
LEONARD C MITCHARD NIXON & VANDERHYE PC8TH FL1100 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARTIER & INNISKILLIN VINTNERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CARTIER WINES & BEVERAGES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by T.G. BRIGHT & CO., LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named FOREST SPRINGS SPRING WATER SPARKLER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |