USPTO serial 74211285
VITASPA BODYSKIN CARE FROM VITABATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITASPA BODYSKIN CARE FROM VITABATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Politano
Frank L. Politano K&L Gates LLPOne Newark Center10th FloorNewark, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and spa products; namely, bar soaps, body lotions, bath gel, bath oil, bath granules | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITABATH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Tsumura International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tsumura International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VITASPA BODYSKIN CARE FROM VITABATH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |