Drawing for MATHEY-TISSOT

USPTO serial 74211796

MATHEY-TISSOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATHEY-TISSOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VINCENT M. AMBERLY

VINCENT M AMBERLY NATH, LAMBERT & AMBERLY1835 K ST NWSTE 750WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 25, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 20, 1993DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 8, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 1, 1993DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance