USPTO serial 74212149
LIGHTSPEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHTSPEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. McCollum
TIMOTHY D MCCOLLUM MCCOLLUM AND BUNCH1530 E SHAW AVE STE 120FRESNO, CA 93710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive parts | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |