USPTO serial 74212170
MAGNOLIA INSTAMEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNOLIA INSTAMEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mandaluyong, Metro Manila, PH
Mandaluyong, Metro Manila, PH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Berg
RICHARD P BERG LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts, eggs, luncheon meats, meat jellies, meat juices, meat paste, meat-based spread, Paksiw Na Lechon (primarily comprised of pork, vinegar, soy sauce and sugar), beef caldereta (primarily comprised of yeast, potatoes, vegetables and spices), menudo (primarily comprised of pork, potatoes, vegetables and spices), mechado (primarily comprised of beef, potatoes and spices), chicken afritada (primarily comprised of chicken, potatoes, vegetables and spices), pork adobo (primarily comprised of pork, soy sauce, vinegar and spices), chicken curry, and beef curry, shrimp, prawns, and lobsters | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |