USPTO serial 74212431
TACO BELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1775649Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 1993
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TACO BELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARISA T. MURPHY, ESQ.
LARISA T MURPHY ESQ MANAGER, TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATIONPIZZA HUT INC14841 DALLAS PKWY FL 8DALLAS, TX 75240-7552Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | tacos, tostadas, fajitas, burritos, enchiladas, tortillas, nachos, taco salad, Mexican pizza, prepared fried flour tortilla confections, and combination enchilada and burrito, for consumption on or off the premises | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1999 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |