USPTO serial 74212622
GUNDEL ANNO 1894
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUNDEL ANNO 1894?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theresa M. Gillis
THERESA M GILLIS JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat; fish; poultry, game; goose liver pate; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; salad dressings; and fruit preserves | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | coffee; tea; candy; sauces; and spices, including paprika | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | beers; mineral and aerated waters; soft drinks; fruit drinks; and fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | armagnac, champagne, liqueurs, and port | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant and catering services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LL Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by LL Partners, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GUNDEL ANNO 1894
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |