USPTO serial 74212649
MAMA ROSA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAMA ROSA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concord, Ontario, L4K 3N1, CA
Concord, Ontario, L4K 3N1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PC555 THIRTEENTH ST N WSTE 701 EWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chewing gum and bubble gum | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |