USPTO serial 74213017
CODE SCANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1999
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CODE SCANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS INC.
WARREN, MI
Other trademarks owned by BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS INC.
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
CHARLOTTE, NC
Cleveland, OH
Cleveland, OH
CHARLOTTE, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Weber
John H. Weber Baker & Hostetler LLPWashington Square, Suite 11001050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20036-5304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | diagnostic code access tool used for maintenance of computerized automotive engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Actron Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GSLE SUBCO L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by SPX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Actron Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Actron Manufacturing Company
- Other trademarks owned by SPX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CODE SCANNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 21, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |