Drawing for TIRE WAREHOUSE STORES

USPTO serial 74213205

TIRE WAREHOUSE STORES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, JYLL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIRE WAREHOUSE STORES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Georges

PETER J GEORGES BRENEMAN & GEORGES3150 COMMONWEALTH AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail store services in the field of automobile tires and partsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 5, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 29, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 5, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance