USPTO serial 74214085
CHEEZERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 1996
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEEZERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHARLOTTE, NC
COLUMBUS CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, INC.
CHARLOTTE, NC
Other trademarks owned by COLUMBUS CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, INC.
Columbus, GA
Columbus, GA
Columbus, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward H. Schuth
EDWARD H SCHUTH ATTN LEGAL DEPT8600 S BLVDCHARLOTTE, NC 28273UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cheese flavored crackers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LANCE MFG. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBUS CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Tom's Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tom's Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tom's Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHEEZERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |