USPTO serial 74214132
NUHEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUHEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
PLZ 9 900 RTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair shampoo, skin lotion and body powder, mouthwash, toothpaste | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | vitamins, dietary tablets, nutritional food supplements, analgesics, antiseptics, antacids, ointments for the treatment of skin disorders, surgical bandages | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | surgical supplies; namely, surgical gloves, gowns and masks; elastic bandages and orthopedic support bandages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMON BROS. INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMON BROS. INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named NUHEALTH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |