USPTO serial 74214220
OPENING WINDOWS TO INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, BARBARA S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENING WINDOWS TO INTERNATIONAL TRADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Tigerman
CHARLES S. TIGERMAN MINDLIN, TIGERMAN & HOLTZMAN1801 CENTURY PARK EAST SUITE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in freight forwarding, import, and export | ABANDONED | Aug 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 3, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |