USPTO serial 74214868
CORE-CAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORE-CAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
DAVID A JACKSON KLAUBER & JACKSON411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | gelatin encased caplet for use for containment of a wide variety of pharmaceuticals and dietary food supplements | ABANDONED | Feb 25, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |