USPTO serial 74215150
RIYADH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIYADH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Riyadh, 11418, SA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Cates
CHARLES E CATES CATES AND HOLLOWAY6991 E CAMELBACK RDSTE D-218SCOTTSDALE, AR 85251Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | metal working machines for making expanded metal net for controlling fires and explosions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 13, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |