Drawing for SPARKLE FELT

USPTO serial 74215189

SPARKLE FELT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHO, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPARKLE FELT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry Cohen

JERRY COHEN PERKINS, SMITH & COHENONE FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042non-woven felt fabric sold as piece goods and packages of cut pieces and imprinted with metallic glitter for household useABANDONEDAug 31, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 9, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 14, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 15, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance