Drawing for HEARTBEAT

USPTO serial 74215495

HEARTBEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVY, MICHAEL S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEARTBEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon E. Groom

SHARON E GROOM HARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED225 DUNCAN MILL RDDON MILLS, ON M3B 3K9CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed publications; namely, books of fictionABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 4, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 7, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance