USPTO serial 74215509
KELLOGG'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KELLOGG'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Pickering
WILLIAM C PICKERING VON BRIESEN & PURTELL, SC411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 700MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | bird food, hamster food, gerbil food, rabbit food, guinea pig food, mouse food, ferret food, fish food, and reptile food | ABANDONED | Dec 7, 1927 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |