USPTO serial 74215514
LIFTPAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 1993
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIFTPAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN HORN
JOHN HORN ALLEN-BRADLEY RELIANCE ELECTRICINDUSTRIAL COMPANY LAW DEPT6065 PARKLAND BLVDCLEVELAND, OH 44124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | A-C and D-C motors, motor generator sets, solid-state D-C and A-C drives for use on escalators, elevators and people-movers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
- Other trademarks owned by Reliance Electric Industrial Company
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named LIFTPAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2003 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |