Drawing for BOLZ

USPTO serial 74215528

BOLZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOLZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl R. Brown

CARL R BROWN BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal containers; namely, double-walled transportation containers and pressure containers for the storage of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, food and liquid made of nickel, steel, stainless steel, titanium and/or aluminumABANDONED—
007drying and transporting atomizers used to process powdered food products; conical mechanical mixing machines and horizontal mechanical mixing machinesABANDONED—
011continuous flow and vortex dryers for industrial use, vacuum dryers used for extracting steam and conical dryers used for drying of media with concentrated additives, waste disposal functions and for pretreatment of raw materials used in the food industry; heating units used with water to heat residential and industrial buildings; toilets, sinks, and pipes and fittings therefor; water-percolated pipe lines for pasteurizing, sterilizing and cooling of food products, pharmaceuticals and plasticsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance