USPTO serial 74215750
SKW - INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS IN DRILLING FLUID CHEMISTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 1994
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SKW - INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS IN DRILLING FLUID CHEMISTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
8223 Trostberg, DE
SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
8223 Trostberg, DE
SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
D-83303, TROSTBERG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Georg Seka
J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products for industrial use; namely, chemicals for use in oil fields, additives and fluids for use in drilling and other general work on oil wells | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by SKW Trostberg Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SKW - INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS IN DRILLING FLUID CHEMISTRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2005 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |