USPTO serial 74216178
POLARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |