USPTO serial 74217076
CHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Louisville, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip L. Kenner
PHILLIP L KENNER RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, ET AL1610 FIRST NATIONAL TWRAKRON, OH 44308-1456UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry consisting of pins, buttons and the like | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed matter consisting of bags, napkins, bumper stickers, pennants, programs and the like | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | hats, T-shirts, sweatshirts, kerchiefs, towels and the like | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | foods consisting of hamburgers, french fries, condiments and the like | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rally's, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHING
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |