USPTO serial 74217148
VIVITAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVITAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel B. Stone
SAMUEL B STONE LYON & LYON611 W SIXTH STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIVITAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VIVITAR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VIVITAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |