USPTO serial 74217156
COLLEGE QUEEN OF AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 1992
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLLEGE QUEEN OF AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond S. Sakis
RAYMOND S SAKIS3155 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 115TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of a beauty pageant | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |