USPTO serial 74217385
VIVACEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVACEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry R. Lipsitz
BARRY R LIPSITZ755 MAIN STMONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | cellulose, powder cellulose, cellulosic fibers, cellulose granulates, and microcrystalline cellulose for use in the manufacture of food, drugs, and cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |