USPTO serial 74217418
MINI MAG +
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINI MAG +?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerrold B. Reilly
PATENT PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE555 W FIFTH ST STE 4600LOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric flashlight accessories sold together or separately; namely, batteries, battery chargers, electrical converters, power cords and attachment parts in the nature of charger cradles, vehicle cigarette lighter adapters for flashlight rechargers, and battery packs for flashlights | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | flashlights and related parts, and component parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |