USPTO serial 74218031
MADAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INFONET TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Ronald Riches
C RONALD RICHES COASTAL TRADEMARK SERVICES555 W HASTINGS STP O BOX 12109VANCOUVER, BC V6B 4N6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer products; namely, computer hardware motherboards; namely, electronic circuit boards; diskettes, hard drives, floppy drives; interface and adapter cards; modems; mouses; keyboards; printers; switches; cables; transformers; computerized voice synthesizers; telephone voice mail communication devices; computerized voice synthesizers; pre-recorded audio and video cassettes; facsimile machines; computer software | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | computer paper; manuals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1994 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 19, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |