USPTO serial 74218756
FAZENDA VISTA ALEGRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAZENDA VISTA ALEGRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF LIDDY SULLIVAN GALWAY & BEGLER PC41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |