USPTO serial 74219001
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Patch
ROBERT J PATCH YOUNG & THOMPSON745 S 23RD STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet soaps, perfumery, essential oils for personal use, dentifrices, hair lotions and cosmetics; namely, oil creams for toilet and bath foundation makeup, rouge, powder for eyelids and face and cheeks, mascara, nail enamel, eyelid pencils, moisturizing creams and lotions and gels and creams and oils and lotions for the care of the skin; | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | horological instruments; namely, clocks and watches | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | luggage, umbrellas, parasols; saddlery; attache cases, suitcases, travel suitcases, purses, beach bags, cardcases and notecases, briefcases, pocket wallets, handbags, travel bags, valises; | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | bed covers; namely, bed linen, bed pads, bed sheets, bedspreads | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | franchising; namely, offering technical service in the establishment and for operation of businesses related to fashion; namely, businesses related to beauty products, jewelry, morocco leather, clothing shops, boutiques and stores for men, women and children, shoe stores, accessory stores and luggage stores | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |