USPTO serial 74219011
PERFORMANCE PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFORMANCE PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Van H. Leichliter, Jr.
VAN H LEICHLITER JR LEGAL DEPTE I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANYWILMINGTON, DE 19898UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | water resistant chemical compositions applied to polyester aramid and nylon cordage to provide longer wear life | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE PLUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |