Drawing for CHARTPLOT

USPTO serial 74219234

CHARTPLOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARTPLOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene S. Winter

GENE S WINTERST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic apparatus; namely, computer and video displays for cartography and course information for sailboats and power boatsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 1993ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance