Drawing for F1

USPTO serial 74219325

F1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1808286Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 30, 1993
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with F1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Ward, Jr.

RICHARD J WARD JR CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001motor oil, gasoline and diesel fuel additives; radiator coolant; automotive cooling system rust inhibitors; brake fluid; hydraulic fluid; radiator flushesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 3, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2003C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 1, 2003C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Apr 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2003CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 20008.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 25, 2000PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 3, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 6, 1999PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 30, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 14, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 15, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 30, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 4, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 20, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance